Information on Proposal Review

HOME » User Information » Call for Proposals » Information on Proposal Review

Proposal Review Process

The fallowing steps outline the entire process from proposal submission to notification of review results.

02
Step

Determination of Evaluation Score and Beam Time Allocation

Each proposal is reviewed by a subcommittee organized by research field, It is evaluated by three to four referees, including subcommittee members, to ensure both expertise and fairness.
03
Step

Acceptance Decisions are made by each review committee.

For neutron proposals, the final decision on acceptance is made at a joint meeting of the Neutron Science Proposal Review Committee and the Proposal Evaluation Committee.
04
Step

Approval of Review Results

The results are approved at a joint meeting of theMaterials and Life Science Facility Advisory Board and the Selection Committee.
05
Step

Notification of Review Results to Users

About the Review Criteria

Review Criteria for Short-Term Proposals

Review Criteria for One-Year Proposals

Review Criteria for Long term proposal

Other Matters Related to Proposal Review

As the “Registered Institution” for the public neutron beamlines  at J-PARC, CROSS has two primary functions:

  1. Proposal Selection
  2. User Support

As part of its Proposal Selection role,  CROSS is responsible for  establishing and consulting a Selection Committee composed of members who are suitably qualified and experienced in relevant fields. To ensure that the Selection Committee can freely and fearlessly provide advice to CROSS from an independent position, candidates for Selection Committee membership are carefully chosen from a range of professions and areas of expertise. Accordingly, with a membership that possesses a wide range of high level specialist expertise, it is one of the roles of the Selection Committee to provide unbiased and independent advice that gives integrity to and inspires confidence in the user selection process.

The Proposal Selection function of CROSS differs slightly between public and contract beamlines. For public beamlines, CROSS is responsible for reviewing and selecting of research proposals. To this end, the Proposal Evaluation Committee (PEC) and Expert Panels, -consisting of both Japanese and international experts- have been established under the Selection Committee. All PEC and panel activities are conducted in English.

For contract beamlines, CROSS is responsible not only for assessing and selecting proposals to use these beamlines, but also for evaluating and approving new contract beamlines facilities. To support this, CROSS has established a Contract Beamlines Evaluation Committee (CBEC) under the Selection Committee. The CBEC’s advice and recommendations are submitted to the Selection Committee for consideration.

The Selection Committee may also establish task forces as needed to consider and advise on specific issues related to facility utilization and promotion.

Related Link